sparks63 wrote:
1. The points that you make are the reason why a few of us begged Ken to keep the site going(Not just Read Only

).
2. One other thing...there is no internet drama here.
3. I am thankful to Ken that he keeps this site going.
1. I stand admonished for my actions, not just by you Scott, but a bit of a list.
2. PMs from Ed, a half hour long conversation last night with Chauncey and a few emails with Dale today is teaching me a few things. I'm a slow, stubborn learner and will do my best to keep the drama at home.
3. On most days its a pleasure, on some I get red marks on my forehead from banging it on my monitor.
For those that have followed me around for 12 or more years you know how much I've given away. Guiding, fishing classes, outings and I still run into few if anyone in spots I have given to 100's.
Many years ago I showed a spot to someone for the first time. He kept throwing his lure saying they had to be there. I knew better and stood on shore telling him he was wasting his time. They weren't there. I could feel it.
The next day he went back to the same spot and caught 14 or more fish. All nice sized. That happens.
Dan Sims learned last year that I can follow an angler down a river and catch fish behind him. In his case, inches from his butt as I cast behind him. Doesn't matter who goes first. Matters who catches the fish.
As for getting out now to catch something, if it weren't for the rain and rising river I was going to spend a few hours at North Aurora over the weekend. Always a good spring spot. Check out the post I left on the Fox forum on fishing prospects.
Now, I don't know. Might be good weekend to do yard work.
We were all naive back then Darth. I actually thought that all anglers would want to do something to conserve and improve the rivers around here. Boy, was I wrong. None of the sites have gone away even though some of them should have.